2ND LEAD (ADDS AUDIO)

No unitary is our understanding: TNA says sharing stage with Indo-US diplomats

[TamilNet, Sunday, 13 May 2012, 18:56 GMT]
In a political seminar organised in Jaffna by Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliamentarian S. Sritharan on Sunday, which was addressed by both the US and Indian diplomats, TNA’s nominated parliamentarian, Mathiaparanam Abraham Sumanthiran, twice received applause from the audience, when he said that the TNA was participating in the talks with the Sri Lankan government with an understanding that there could be no solution within the unitary constitution. But he was suggesting that there is ‘something’ in the 13th Amendment, even though he seemed agreeing that there is ‘nothing’ in the 13th Amendment. As the IC, especially India and the USA want a united Sri Lanka, if the TNA is not showing agreement, it would lose international backing, he said. Neither the Tamil people nor the TNA did ask for Tamil Eelam, he replied to a question.

Seminar in Jaffna
Guruparan Kumaravadivel addressing the audience


Seminar in Jaffna
Father of a son and three grandsons who sacrificed their lives in the freedom struggle lits the May 2012 memorial candle honouring the sacrifices of the fighters and civilians who lost their lives in Mu'l'livaaykkaal
Jaffna event
Seminar in Jaffna
Paul Carter and his wife lighting the ceremonial lamp
Seminar in Jaffna
Guruparan Kumaravadivel
Seminar in Jaffna
Participants paying tribute to war dead in Mu'l'livaaykkaal
Political observers who attended the event said Sumanthiran's address was indirectly hinting that the TNA was going to take part in the All Party Committee with the blessings of the opposition, and the presence of both the US and Indian embassy officials was a show of solidarity that TNA was having a strong international backing.

Paul M. Carter, the chief of political affairs section in the US embassy in Colombo and V. Mahalingam, the Deputy High Commissioner for India in Jaffna, participated the seminar.

Carter thanked TNA for inviting him, while Sritharan maintained that the seminar was organised by him in his individual capacity. Carter in his address said that the political solution should be acceptable ‘to all’.

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met the Indian Prime Minister at his residence in New Delhi on Tuesday and both have agreed to work closely in expediting the ‘Sri Lankan’ peace process, by bringing the Tamil political parties to the negotiation table, media reports in Colombo said.

Sumanthiran was trying to imply to his defense that the IC was for TNA's participation [in talks or APC] with pre-conditions and one such pre-condition is going to be that the solution cannot be found within a unitary Sri Lanka, but within a united Sri Lanka, observers said.

Sumanthiran was giving the impression that one needed to convince the IC that Colombo wouldn't agree to anything acceptable within the united framework and that by participating the process of Rajapaksa and going after ICs line of thinking only the TNA could demonstrate the need for changes in the IC policies. If the change comes in then there would be a different solution, he implied that it could mean Tamil Eelam.

Sumanthiran hinted that the documents that made the bedrock of the post-Mu'l'livaaykkaal negotiations were Mangala Munasinghe proposals, 1995, 1997 and 2000 proposals of Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga (CBK) and the 2006 proposals of Mahinda Rajapaksa's APRC.

Lecturer in Law at the University of Jaffna and civil society activist, Guruparan Kumaravadivel also was invited for the Seminar.

Mr. Guruparan in his address explained with clarity to the public why the 13 Amendment, 13 Plus etc., would not work.

If a referendum is conducted for all, the Sinhala masses would vote against any Amendment needed to effect any constitutional changes. Even the composition of judges in the SL Supreme Court would go against such a restructuring, Guruparan said, citing earlier examples.

Sinnathurai Varatharajan former lecturer in economics at the University of Peradeniya addressed the audience on the economic challenges faced by the island and the struggle for Tamil rights.

There was an array of questions at the seminar, which was a second session in line, titled “Contemporary political climate and the way forward to win Tamils’ social and political rights.”

When a senior woman asked what the TNA was asking as solution to the national question of Eezham Tamils, Sumanthiran responded by saying that the TNA was never claiming Tamil Eelam.

A journalist interfered seeking clarity, whether it was the TNAs position or the position of Eezham Tamils.

Then, Sumanthiran responded by saying neither the public nor the TNA did ask for Tamil Eelam. He referred to the 2010 election manifesto of the TNA, conveniently forgetting the fact it was a few in the TNA hierarchy, including himself, who had come up with the election manifesto despite facing public criticism. People had no choice other than electing the TNA based on its pre-Mu'l'livaaykkaal legacy.

TNA never made the denouncement of Eelam as the primary question as was in the case of the 1977 election that made the Vaddukkoaddai Resolution as the prime issue.

There were requests that the TNA should first seek repeal of the 6th Amendment to pave way for Tamils to speak freely on the issue.

The TNA election agenda was completely stage-managed especially by India and the USA and the TNA was agreeable to hoodwink of fabricating ‘public consent’ to the denouncement of Tamil Eelam, observers said.

While the need of the time is Eezham Tamils to demonstrate their will and ability in democratically constructing an alternative state of theirs in the island, and while this has to be proved in the East striking an agreement with the Muslims, the TNA leadership is going in a different direction, was a comment heard from new generation political activists attended the seminar.

Similarly the diaspora is wasting its energy in contentions over the Mu’l’livaaykkaal Day, while their guts have to be actually demonstrated in questioning the powers to the face, the activists in the island further said.


Chronology:

 

Latest 15 Reports
21.09.17 22:14  
Champoor Tamils’ security, livelihood threatened by US military partnership with genocidal Sri Lanka
20.09.17 23:37   Photo
Sathasivam papers on Sumerian-Tamil connections see the light of day
19.09.17 22:53  
Tamil village in Batticaloa-Polonnaruwa border Sinhalicized by Mahaweli authority, Survey Dept
18.09.17 18:18   Photo
Uprooted people find houses destroyed by SL Navy in Ira'nai-theevu after 2008
17.09.17 22:07  
Muslims oppose Colombo's ‘Sinhala-only’ policy in public administration of Ampaa'rai
16.09.17 23:49  
Families of enforced disappeared want answers, no deceptive bills to genocidal system
15.09.17 23:30   Photo
30th remembrance of Lt Col Thileepan strengthens resolve among Eezham Tamils
14.09.17 22:52   Photo
Sirisena’s Mahaweli ministry twists old records to Sinhalicize Paduvaankarai
13.09.17 16:39  
EPRLF opposes 20A to SL Constitution, ITAK duo wrongs again says Premachandran
12.09.17 23:17   Photo
Alienate lands to Sinhala colonists or face transfer: SL Governor warns Tamil DS in Vanni
11.09.17 12:10  
Risking legal action, Hakeem wants to transfer lands to Hizbulla’s colony in Batticaloa
10.09.17 23:24   Photo
Uprooted fishermen vow to continue their fight for Pa'l'li-munai in Mannaar
09.09.17 23:29  
Mano Ganesan’s NGO Secretariat restricts freedom of organisation in Batticaloa
08.09.17 19:23  
I'rakkaamam Police behaves as occupying Sinhala Force: Muslims
07.09.17 18:03  
SL Attorney General's Dept., TID continue to conspire against Tamil political prisoners
 
Find this article at:
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=35180